Skip to content
HamRadioSetup Get licensed, get on the air
Menu

Radial Field Planner for Vertical Antennas

The short answer

A vertical needs either four elevated resonant radials cut to 234 divided by frequency in feet, or 32 or more on-ground radials at about an eighth of a wavelength. Four on-ground radials wastes 3 to 4 decibels in soil heating, which is more than half your transmitter power. Thirty-two brings that under 1.2 dB, and 64 is close to the practical ceiling.

Elevated
4, resonant
On ground, good
32 or more
4 radials costs
3 to 4 dB
On-ground length
Eighth wave

The radial field is the half of a vertical antenna that nobody photographs and everybody skips. It is also the difference between a vertical that works and the many verticals that gave the design its reputation for mediocrity. Current leaving the radiator has to return through something, and if that something is soil, a large fraction of your transmitter output ends up warming the garden.

Calculator

Radial field plan and wire budget

Loss figures are the widely reproduced results of the classic ground system measurements, which have been confirmed repeatedly by amateur modelling since.

MHz
ft
Short radials are fine on the ground. Run them as far as the garden allows.

Recommended radial length

16 ft 5 in

Total wire needed

525 ft

Approximate ground loss

0.8 to 1.2 dB

Angle between radials

11 degrees

Power reaching the antenna

About 80 percent

Thirty-two radials is where most of the available benefit has arrived.

Elevated radial (ft) = 234 / f(MHz)   |   On-ground radial ≈ 0.125 × wavelength

Two systems, two sets of rules

Almost every argument about radials on the air is two people describing different systems. Elevated and on-ground radial fields work by different mechanisms and follow opposite rules about count and length.

Elevated radials are the other half of the antenna

Raise the feedpoint at least eight feet, run four wires cut to a resonant quarter wavelength, and slope them down at around 45 degrees. Those four wires are radiating elements forming the counterpoise directly, so the soil beneath them barely participates and its quality barely matters.

Four is genuinely enough, which is the surprising part. The fifth and sixth radials in an elevated system add almost nothing measurable, because the currents in a symmetrical set of four already cancel their own radiation in the horizontal plane. Adding more is a common instinct and it is wasted wire.

Sloping them has a convenient side effect. A quarter-wave vertical over a perfect ground plane presents about 36 ohms; drooping the radials raises that towards 50, so a 45 degree droop typically lands close enough to 50 ohms that no matching network is needed at all. The cost is mechanical: four sloping wires at head height are a hazard in a garden people walk through, and they need real anchors.

On-ground radials are a shield

Lay wires on the soil and they stop behaving as resonant elements. The soil dominates, and the wires act as a screen intercepting return currents before those currents enter the ground where they would dissipate as heat. The measure that matters is therefore how much of the ground surface near the antenna is covered, not whether any wire is the right length.

That produces the rule that surprises people: more shorter radials beats fewer longer ones. Thirty-two radials at an eighth of a wavelength outperform eight at a quarter wavelength, using the same total wire. Return current density is highest close to the base and falls with distance, so the wire is worth most in the first few metres.

On-ground radial systems and what each is worth
Radials Length Loss Verdict
4 0.25 wavelength 3 to 4 dB Half your power warms the soil. This is what most disappointing verticals have.
8 0.15 wavelength 2 to 3 dB A meaningful improvement for very little wire. The minimum worth calling a ground system.
16 0.125 wavelength 1.5 to 2 dB A reasonable compromise for a small garden.
32 0.125 wavelength 0.8 to 1.2 dB Where most of the available benefit has arrived. A good practical target.
64 0.25 wavelength 0.3 to 0.5 dB Near the practical ceiling for an amateur installation.
120 0.5 wavelength Under 0.2 dB The broadcast standard. Diminishing returns unless you own a transmitter site.

Read the top row carefully, because it describes the most common amateur vertical installation in existence. Four on-ground radials costs 3 to 4 decibels, which is more than half your transmitter power converted directly into warm soil. A 100 watt station with that ground field is radiating roughly 40 watts. Adding wire is the cheapest improvement available to it by a very wide margin.

The SWR trap

This is the single most misleading thing about verticals. Ground loss appears at the feedpoint as resistance, and it adds to the roughly 36 ohms of radiation resistance a quarter-wave vertical presents. Add 14 ohms of loss and the feedpoint reads 50 ohms exactly, giving a beautiful 1 to 1 match while nearly 30 percent of your power is being dissipated in the ground.

A properly built vertical with a large radial field frequently reads a worse SWR than a bad one, because it is closer to its true 36 ohms. If you add radials and your SWR gets slightly worse, you have almost certainly improved the antenna. Judge a vertical by measured signal reports over time, or by modelling, not by the meter. The relationship is worked through on the SWR calculator.

Building it, practically

  1. Buy wire by the spool. A Paladin 14 AWG stranded copper wire, 500 ft$74.50 is 500 feet, which is 32 radials at an eighth wavelength on 40 metres with wire left over. Buying individual lengths costs several times as much. For lighter portable work, thinner wire is fine because radials carry current but no mechanical load.
  2. Do not cut them all the same length. Run each as far as the garden allows in its direction. A lopsided field that covers the available ground beats a symmetrical set of four short ones every time.
  3. Bond them all at a single point. A Copper grounding bus bar kit, 16 positions$21.50 or a simple ring of heavy wire around the base, with every radial connected to it and one connection to the coax braid. One bond point, no loops.
  4. Pin them down and leave them on the surface. Landscape staples every few feet. Grass grows through within a season and the lawnmower stops finding them. Burying is optional and one or two inches is plenty.
  5. Add a common-mode choke at the feedpoint. Twelve turns of coax on an FT-240-31 ferrite toroid core$11.67. Without it the coax shield becomes an unintended radial running in one direction, which skews the pattern and puts RF in the shack.
  6. Add more wire next year. A radial field is the one part of an antenna that improves incrementally. Every wire you add helps a little, and you can keep adding for years.

For a portable vertical, a pre-cut set such as the Super Antenna MR4010 radial set$29.99 saves the measuring and packs into a bag. It is a compromise by design, since a portable field is elevated only slightly and consists of a handful of wires rather than dozens, but it is dramatically better than the nothing that most portable verticals are used with.

Soil quality changes the arithmetic

How ground conductivity affects the radial requirement
Ground Conductivity Practical effect
Salt waterExcellentEffectively a perfect ground plane. A vertical on a shoreline behaves like a laboratory model.
Marsh, wet clayVery goodSixteen radials performs like thirty-two elsewhere.
Average agricultural soilModerateThe figures in the table above apply directly.
Dry sand, rocky groundPoorRadials matter more, not less. Budget for 64 or go elevated.
Urban fill over rubbleUnpredictableMeasure results rather than trusting any table. Elevated radials sidestep the question entirely.

The counterintuitive line is the last two. Bad soil does not mean radials are pointless; it means they matter more, because there is more loss for them to shield you from. If your ground is genuinely poor and you cannot lay enough wire, elevating the feedpoint and using four resonant radials removes the soil from the equation almost entirely, and it is the better answer.

What a radial field is not

A radial field is a radio frequency counterpoise. It is not a lightning ground, not a safety ground, and not a substitute for either. The two systems serve different purposes and are built to different standards, though they must be bonded together.

A vertical antenna outdoors needs a proper ground electrode at its base, bonded back to the building service ground, with a listed arrester on the coax at the entry point. A hundred quarter-wave radials will not carry a lightning strike anywhere useful, and an isolated ground rod that is not bonded to the service ground creates a potential difference during a strike that is more dangerous than no rod at all. An 8 ft copper-bonded ground rod kit with clamp$54.80 at the antenna base and a Proxicast ProGrade coaxial lightning arrester, SO-239$19.95 at the entry panel are the minimum, and the whole system is described on station grounding and lightning protection.

Common questions

Questions people ask about this

How many radials does a vertical antenna need?

Four elevated resonant radials, or 32 or more if they lie on the ground. Those are two different systems following different rules. Elevated radials form the counterpoise directly and four is genuinely enough. Ground radials work as a shield reducing soil loss, so the useful measure is how much ground surface is covered by wire, and more shorter wires beats fewer longer ones.

How long should ground radials be?

For an on-ground field, about an eighth of a wavelength is the efficient length once you have sixteen or more of them. Making them a quarter wavelength only helps once you are past roughly 60 radials. The reason is that on-ground radials are not resonant elements; the soil dominates their behaviour, so what matters is coverage rather than resonance.

Do radials need to be buried?

No. Laid on the surface and pinned down works identically from a radio frequency point of view, and the grass grows through them within a season. Burying is done for lawnmower survival rather than performance, and one or two inches deep is plenty. Bare copper corrodes into the soil and still works; insulated wire lasts longer.

Can I use fewer radials if the soil is good?

Yes, and the difference is substantial. Damp, salty or clay soil conducts far better than dry sand or rock, so a vertical over a marsh needs fewer radials for the same efficiency than one over a desert. If you are near salt water, a vertical on the shoreline behaves as though it had a perfect ground plane, which is why coastal stations have a reputation on the low bands.

Do radials have to be the same length as each other?

For an elevated system, yes, because they are resonant elements and unequal lengths unbalance the antenna. For an on-ground system, no. Run them as far as the garden allows in each direction and let the short ones be short. A lopsided ground field is far better than four symmetrical ones.

Does a good SWR mean the radial field is adequate?

No, and the relationship is backwards. Ground loss appears at the feedpoint as resistance and adds to the roughly 36 ohms of radiation resistance, which pushes the total towards 50 ohms. A vertical with a poor radial field therefore often reads a better SWR than a good one. Low SWR on a vertical is not evidence of anything except a convenient impedance.

Keep going

Related on this site

Keeping your own cut lengths, SWR sweeps and exposure record? The Station Build & Antenna Planner is the paid version of these pages: 8 printable worksheets you fill in with your own numbers, plus the full PDF, $29.

Disclaimer Researched guidance for planning purposes, not professional engineering, electrical or legal advice. Antenna work, RF exposure, mast and tower work, grounding and battery handling all carry real risk that depends on your specific site and installation. Verify anything safety-critical against current FCC rules, the National Electrical Code and the manufacturer's own documentation, and hire a professional where the job calls for one. We research equipment from published specifications, regulatory documents and verified owner reviews rather than claiming hands-on testing we have not done.